E & B
different manner from lands outside those limits?
The argument of the Military Authorities so
far as I can gather, is that the restrictions placed upon
building upon lands within Military reserves make the lands
valueless for building purposes, and reduce the selling value
of the land to almost nil: that the value of the lands being
very small, such lands should be transferred to the Military
Authorities at a nominal sum.
12. As I understand it, lands within Military
Reserves may not be sold for building purposes without the
consent of the Military Authorities and only on condition
that in warfare buildings Created thereon are destroyed no
compensation will be given.
13. This restriction would by no means prevent
purchasers of the lands coming forward if the Military
Authorities would consent to allow buildings to be erected,
If the Military Authorities refused that consent but pro-
ceeded themselves to build barracks, it seems evident that
their action would be inconsistent and that the chances of
buildings erected being destroyed in warfare are considered
by them to be infinitesimal.
Purchasers under condition of having no claim
to compensation would arise, first, because they would be ready
to take the small risk of their buildings being destroyed; se-
condly, because compensation, in the event of a successful war,
would no doubt be obtained from the defeated enemy, and third-
ly because, in the event of a foreign foe proving victorious,
a
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.